🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". A law is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to approve a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a solid first step," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, interest built behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, legislation is mostly occurring at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to copy the Australian path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Outside of these regions, further nations are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this international conversation unfolds, the actions of Australia and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.