Skip to content
GamblePoint US

Tetris Didn't Triumph at This Gaming Ceremony — A New Category Might Solve This

Each time a prominent prize-giving event approaches, you'll find a clamor for the addition additional classifications to honor underappreciated efforts and fill the hearts of followers with niche passions.

Another commentator made the case supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. So would tabletop games, which is someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward just as with other dedicated enthusiasts, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand remains most pressing and significant. The demand is this: It's essential to create a category for puzzle games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Classifying creative works isn't exact; it’s very subjective, and inevitably generate discussions and end in fuzzy definitions. It's understandable that cinema institutions don’t do it. But it is an essential concession within the realm of interactive entertainment, that demonstrate such variety it's challenging to consider them as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of achievement in video games to be recognized, and to ensure all game types to compete fairly, specific award classifications remain vital.

Existing Game Classification System

Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include award types recognizing Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these award types actually cover a lot of ground, making space possible for most games within them.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. No appropriate category exists for their placement. Think about these recent excellent titles, each quite distinct: the architectural riddles of one title, intense tile-matching from another release, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. Which classification works among existing types? Unfortunately, nowhere.

Acknowledgment Issues

Many instances occur excellent brain-teasers published annually that have no home during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested independent game categories.

  • A renowned logic title received no recognition in any category that year
  • Another creative title missed out during that ceremony
  • Well-received sorting experience got ignored that year
  • Only a few puzzle games barely qualified for niche award types

Importance of Logic Titles

Frequently they represent modest productions, yet the craft of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games rank among most engaged experiences worldwide and have been for an extended period.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with popular creative games competing to become best-selling game of all time; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, while interacting with diverse game types.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Puzzle games wouldn’t have this problem. One could readily select five nominees engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — perhaps, with difficulty, since numerous excellent so many good games out.

Restating the point, these include experiences that otherwise have no home during prominent ceremonies. Puzzle game makers function at the demanding boundary of video game design, creating some of the purest expressions of the video game form. Just like movie stunt professionals, they merit acknowledgment. Don't make them wait 35 years.

The writer

John Shepherd

Elara is a seasoned gambling analyst with over a decade of experience in reviewing online casinos and sports betting platforms.

GamblePoint US

Type to search articles.